ARUNAVA MUKERJI AND OTHERS ASIF IKBAL BAIDYA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/1327/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0136922026

Next Hearing

23rd July 2026

Filing Number

CRR/1307/2026

Filing Date

19-03-2026

Registration No

CRR/1327/2026

Registration Date

20-03-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Proceedings ( 75 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528
Indian Penal Code Act ,1860 Section 498A/406/34
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

ARUNAVA MUKERJI AND OTHERS ASIF IKBAL BAIDYA

SABYASACHI MUKERJI

KAKALI MUKERJI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

RADHIKA MUKERJI

Hearing History

27-03-2026

NEW MOTION

23-07-2026

NEW MOTION 1

09-06-2026

NEW MOTION 1

08-06-2026

NEW MOTION 1

22-05-2026

NEW MOTION 1

Orders

09-06-2026
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE

Case Summary: CRR/1327/2026 Outcome: Petition admitted; case adjourned to 23rd July 2026. Petitioners sought quashing of Golf Green Police Station Case No. 272 (charges under IPC §498A/406/34 and Dowry Prohibition Act §3/4), arguing the investigation was fatally flawed—complainant unexamined, material witnesses not examined, inordinate FIR delay, and no medical reports seized. The court admitted the application and directed petitioners to serve the State, with the State required to produce the case diary on the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRR/1327/2026 Outcome: Petition admitted; case adjourned to 23rd July 2026. Petitioners sought quashing of Golf Green Police Station Case No. 272 (charges under IPC §498A/406/34 and Dowry Prohibition Act §3/4), arguing the investigation was fatally flawed—complainant unexamined, material witnesses not examined, inordinate FIR delay, and no medical reports seized. The court admitted the application and directed petitioners to serve the State, with the State required to produce the case diary on the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case