DIPAK SUBBA MD. NASIRUL HAQUE vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/7062/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 07th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0136742026
Filing Number
WPA/6972/2026
Filing Date
19-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPA/7062/2026
Registration Date
20-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
Bench Type
WARNING LIST
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DIPAK SUBBA MD. NASIRUL HAQUE
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
-
2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, W.B.
-
3.DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
-
4.SPECIAL SUPDT. OF POLICE (I)
-
5.SUPDT. OF POLICE, HOOGHLY POLICE DISTRICT
-
6.COMM. OF POLICE, BARRACKPORE
-
7.ADDL. S.P. (D.I.B.) BARRACKPORE POLICE COMMISSINERATE
-
8.SI MD. DANISH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF
The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition WPA No. 7062/2026 filed by Dipak Subba against the State of West Bengal and police officials due to the petitioner's non-appearance before the court and failure to press the petition. Justice Amrita Sinha ordered dismissal as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner and no accommodation was sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
06-Apr-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
02-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/7062/2026
The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition WPA No. 7062/2026 filed by Dipak Subba against the State of West Bengal and police officials due to the petitioner's non-appearance before the court and failure to press the petition. Justice Amrita Sinha ordered dismissal as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner and no accommodation was sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts