KALPANA DAS KINGSUK MONDAL vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — CRM(M)/767/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(3). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0135762026
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/734/2026
Filing Date
19-03-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/767/2026
Registration Date
20-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KALPANA DAS KINGSUK MONDAL
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
DILIP KUMAR DAS
BABLI DAS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
CANCELLATION - ANTICIPATORY BAIL
CANCELLATION - ANTICIPATORY BAIL
CANCELLATION - ANTICIPATORY BAIL
CANCELLATION - ANTICIPATORY BAIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL |
| 07-05-2026 | CANCELLATION - ANTICIPATORY BAIL |
| 04-05-2026 | CANCELLATION - ANTICIPATORY BAIL |
| 30-04-2026 | CANCELLATION - ANTICIPATORY BAIL |
| 23-04-2026 | CANCELLATION - ANTICIPATORY BAIL |
Orders
The High Court at Calcutta dismissed Kalpana Das's application to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to her brother (Dilip Kumar Das) and sister-in-law (Babli Das) by the Sessions Judge. Although Das alleged they misappropriated Rs. 32 lakhs from her SBI savings account and attempted her murder despite promising to care for her, Justice Jay Sengupta found no patent illegality in the Sessions Judge's decision, noting the allegations were substantially documentary in nature and the lower court had reasoned its order after reviewing case materials. The petition was dismissed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court at Calcutta dismissed Kalpana Das's application to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to her brother (Dilip Kumar Das) and sister-in-law (Babli Das) by the Sessions Judge. Although Das alleged they misappropriated Rs. 32 lakhs from her SBI savings account and attempted her murder despite promising to care for her, Justice Jay Sengupta found no patent illegality in the Sessions Judge's decision, noting the allegations were substantially documentary in nature and the lower court had reasoned its order after reviewing case materials. The petition was dismissed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts