PIYA MONDAL RAJLAKSHMI GHATAK vs DIPENDU MONDAL — CO/1043/2026

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0135202026

Filing Number

CO/1044/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

CO/1043/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PIYA MONDAL RAJLAKSHMI GHATAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DIPENDU MONDAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF

    The court granted the petitioner's (wife's) revisional application to transfer Matrimonial Suit No. 476 of 2025 from Family Court, Bankura to District Judge, Paschim Bardhaman. The court found that the petitioner, who resides in Paschim Bardhaman with her 2-year-old child, would face hardship traveling regularly to Bankura. The court permitted virtual appearances if requested and directed the receiving court to proceed in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Extension Of Interim Order 2

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/1043/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the petitioner's (wife's) revisional application to transfer Matrimonial Suit No. 476 of 2025 from Family Court, Bankura to District Judge, Paschim Bardhaman. The court found that the petitioner, who resides in Paschim Bardhaman with her 2-year-old child, would face hardship traveling regularly to Bankura. The court permitted virtual appearances if requested and directed the receiving court to proceed in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case