SUJAY KUKMAR SHARMA NILAY BARAN MANDAL vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/6952/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0135052026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

25th March 2026

Filing Number

WPA/6881/2026

Filing Date

19-03-2026

Registration No

WPA/6952/2026

Registration Date

19-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

SUJAY KUKMAR SHARMA NILAY BARAN MANDAL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

25-03-2026

NEW MOTION

04-05-2026

MOTION

06-04-2026

MOTION

02-04-2026

NEW MOTION

01-04-2026

NEW MOTION

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

Case Summary: WPA 6952/2026 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the petitioner's writ petition seeking compassionate appointment following his father's death-in-harness in 2008. Although the petitioner's application was filed within the stipulated two-year period, Justice Amrita Sinha held that he lacked diligence in pursuing the claim and approached the court belatedly—nearly eighteen years later in 2026. The court reasoned that compassionate appointment is an exception to general recruitment rules intended for immediate financial relief, and the petitioner's prolonged delay negated his eligibility despite the amended 2016 notification extending the time limit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 6952/2026 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the petitioner's writ petition seeking compassionate appointment following his father's death-in-harness in 2008. Although the petitioner's application was filed within the stipulated two-year period, Justice Amrita Sinha held that he lacked diligence in pursuing the claim and approached the court belatedly—nearly eighteen years later in 2026. The court reasoned that compassionate appointment is an exception to general recruitment rules intended for immediate financial relief, and the petitioner's prolonged delay negated his eligibility despite the amended 2016 notification extending the time limit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case