TECHNOFAB ENGINEERING-SN ENVIROTECH JV AND ORS SOMNATH GANGOPADHYAY vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/6833/2026
Case under The Contract ,1872 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0134512026
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
WPA/6850/2026
Filing Date
19-03-2026
Registration No
WPA/6833/2026
Registration Date
19-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Residuary ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TECHNOFAB ENGINEERING-SN ENVIROTECH JV AND ORS SOMNATH GANGOPADHYAY
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO
NEW MOTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | NEW MOTION |
Orders
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Technofab Engineering-SN Envirotech JV, finding it not maintainable because the petitioners had already filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act before the Commercial Court, which had refused interim injunction. The court reasoned that petitioners should pursue their remedy through the Commercial Appellate Division rather than bypass it via writ petition under Article 226, though it requested the Commercial Court to expedite the hearing of the arbitration application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Technofab Engineering-SN Envirotech JV, finding it not maintainable because the petitioners had already filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act before the Commercial Court, which had refused interim injunction. The court reasoned that petitioners should pursue their remedy through the Commercial Appellate Division rather than bypass it via writ petition under Article 226, though it requested the Commercial Court to expedite the hearing of the arbitration application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts