MANJUNATH V. HEBBAR ALIAS MANJUNATH HEBBAR AYAN CHAKRABORTY vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/1299/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 20th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0133342026
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
Filing Number
CRR/1277/2026
Filing Date
18-03-2026
Registration No
CRR/1299/2026
Registration Date
19-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE
Coram
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Exercise of inherent power u/s 482 Cr. P. C. ( 40 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
20th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANJUNATH V. HEBBAR ALIAS MANJUNATH HEBBAR AYAN CHAKRABORTY
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
EMARS MINNIG AND CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE
NEW MOTION
TO BE MENTIONED
TO BE MENTIONED
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 20-05-2026 | TO BE MENTIONED |
| 19-05-2026 | TO BE MENTIONED |
| 18-05-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 04-05-2026 | NEW MOTION |
Orders
The court modified the trial court's order to grant the petitioner exemption from physical appearance during plea proceedings if properly represented, and allowed him to avail section 313(5) Cr.P.C. at an appropriate stage. However, the court deferred the decision on physical appearance at judgment delivery to a later stage and clarified that the petitioner cannot be compelled to use specific counsel against his choice. The trial court was directed to expedite proceedings without unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court modified the trial court's order to grant the petitioner exemption from physical appearance during plea proceedings if properly represented, and allowed him to avail section 313(5) Cr.P.C. at an appropriate stage. However, the court deferred the decision on physical appearance at judgment delivery to a later stage and clarified that the petitioner cannot be compelled to use specific counsel against his choice. The trial court was directed to expedite proceedings without unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts