MOSRAKUL MALLICK BABITA PRAMANIK vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/6843/2026
Case under West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0132422026
Filing Number
WPA/6739/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPA/6843/2026
Registration Date
19-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOSRAKUL MALLICK BABITA PRAMANIK
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF
The court dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable, finding that the petitioner's dispute over construction permission on an undivided property is a civil matter rather than one for writ jurisdiction. Although the Pradhan granted construction permission, the building plan lacked proper Panchayat signatures and authorization, and since the property is subject to a pending partition suit, the appropriate remedy lies in civil court, not before the high court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
22-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
20-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
17-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
13-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
10-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
08-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
01-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
30-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
27-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/6843/2026
The court dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable, finding that the petitioner's dispute over construction permission on an undivided property is a civil matter rather than one for writ jurisdiction. Although the Pradhan granted construction permission, the building plan lacked proper Panchayat signatures and authorization, and since the property is subject to a pending partition suit, the appropriate remedy lies in civil court, not before the high court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts