PROTIMA MAHAPATRA KANCHAN ROY vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/6797/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0131712026
Filing Number
WPA/6700/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPA/6797/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PROTIMA MAHAPATRA KANCHAN ROY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF
The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition filed by Smt. Protima Mahapatra seeking compassionate appointment following her father's death-in-harness in 2003. The Court held that compassionate appointment is discretionary relief intended to address immediate financial crises, not a claimable right, and that her application filed nearly nineteen years after the employee's death was fatally belated and did not merit consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
06-Apr-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
02-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
01-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
31-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
30-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
27-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
25-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/6797/2026
The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition filed by Smt. Protima Mahapatra seeking compassionate appointment following her father's death-in-harness in 2003. The Court held that compassionate appointment is discretionary relief intended to address immediate financial crises, not a claimable right, and that her application filed nearly nineteen years after the employee's death was fatally belated and did not merit consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts