BADAL BHATTACHARYA SUSMITA DEY (BASU) vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/6915/2026

Case under Road Transport Corporations Act ,1950 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0129782026

Filing Number

WPA/6592/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPA/6915/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Road Transport Corporations Act ,1950 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BADAL BHATTACHARYA SUSMITA DEY (BASU)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA 6915/2026 The High Court at Calcutta allowed the writ petition of Badal Bhattacharya, a retired CSTC employee, directing the Calcutta State Transport Corporation to disburse his remaining 80% provident fund dues and full gratuity within twelve weeks, plus 6% simple interest from his retirement date (31st October 2025) until actual payment. The court imposed an additional 2% interest penalty (totaling 8%) if payment exceeds the stipulated deadline, recognizing these as statutory entitlements owed immediately upon retirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/6915/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 6915/2026 The High Court at Calcutta allowed the writ petition of Badal Bhattacharya, a retired CSTC employee, directing the Calcutta State Transport Corporation to disburse his remaining 80% provident fund dues and full gratuity within twelve weeks, plus 6% simple interest from his retirement date (31st October 2025) until actual payment. The court imposed an additional 2% interest penalty (totaling 8%) if payment exceeds the stipulated deadline, recognizing these as statutory entitlements owed immediately upon retirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case