SHYAMAL DAS SUSMITA DEY (BASU) vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/6918/2026

Case under Road Transport Corporations Act ,1950 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0129772026

Filing Number

WPA/6591/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPA/6918/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Road Transport Corporations Act ,1950 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHYAMAL DAS SUSMITA DEY (BASU)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA 6918/2026 The Calcutta High Court directed the Calcutta State Transport Corporation Employees' Provident Fund Trust to disburse Shyamal Das's complete provident fund dues within 12 weeks, with 6% simple interest per annum from his retirement date (28 February 2025). The court imposed a penalty of additional 2% interest (totaling 8%) if payment was not made within the stipulated timeframe, given the petitioner had waited over a year for his statutorily due terminal benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/6918/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 6918/2026 The Calcutta High Court directed the Calcutta State Transport Corporation Employees' Provident Fund Trust to disburse Shyamal Das's complete provident fund dues within 12 weeks, with 6% simple interest per annum from his retirement date (28 February 2025). The court imposed a penalty of additional 2% interest (totaling 8%) if payment was not made within the stipulated timeframe, given the petitioner had waited over a year for his statutorily due terminal benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case