SISIR KUMAR MONDAL AISHWARYA DATTA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/6717/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0129692026

Filing Number

WPA/6585/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPA/6717/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Post Retirement 90 ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SISIR KUMAR MONDAL AISHWARYA DATTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA 6717/2026 The High Court at Calcutta granted full pension to retired Assistant Teacher Sisir Kumar Mondal, holding that a pending criminal case unrelated to his employment cannot withhold pensionary benefits. The court interpreted Rule 19(4) of the DCRB Rules, 2009 to require that "judicial proceedings" must have nexus with employment conduct; since the criminal charges involved no moral turpitude and no departmental proceeding was initiated against him, the District Inspector was directed to sanction his pension with arrears and 8% interest within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/6717/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 6717/2026 The High Court at Calcutta granted full pension to retired Assistant Teacher Sisir Kumar Mondal, holding that a pending criminal case unrelated to his employment cannot withhold pensionary benefits. The court interpreted Rule 19(4) of the DCRB Rules, 2009 to require that "judicial proceedings" must have nexus with employment conduct; since the criminal charges involved no moral turpitude and no departmental proceeding was initiated against him, the District Inspector was directed to sanction his pension with arrears and 8% interest within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case