TAPAS KUMAR MANNA BHASKAR ROY vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/6640/2026
Case under Essential Commodities Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0129442026
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
WPA/6575/2026
Filing Date
17-03-2026
Registration No
WPA/6640/2026
Registration Date
18-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TAPAS KUMAR MANNA BHASKAR ROY
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 06-05-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 04-05-2026 | NEW MOTION |
Orders
The court disposed of the writ petition without deciding its merits, directing respondent no. 4 (Food & Supply Department) to consider and dispose of the petitioner's pending representation dated 12.3.2026 within eight weeks, affording both parties a hearing, and to communicate the decision within one week thereafter. The court noted that the private respondent had already been selected for the fair price shop dealership license, but since the license had not yet been granted and the petitioner's representation remained pending, the authorities were permitted to conduct further inspections if necessary before making a final decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court disposed of the writ petition without deciding its merits, directing respondent no. 4 (Food & Supply Department) to consider and dispose of the petitioner's pending representation dated 12.3.2026 within eight weeks, affording both parties a hearing, and to communicate the decision within one week thereafter. The court noted that the private respondent had already been selected for the fair price shop dealership license, but since the license had not yet been granted and the petitioner's representation remained pending, the authorities were permitted to conduct further inspections if necessary before making a final decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts