AVIJIT SARKAR AND ANR LAKSHMI PRASAD BHATTACHARYA vs SUKMAR HALDER — WPCRC/5/2025
Case under Court of Contempt Act ,1971 Section NA. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 07th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0129302023
Next Hearing
27th March 2023
Filing Number
CPAN/361/2023
Filing Date
17-03-2023
Registration No
WPCRC/5/2025
Registration Date
17-03-2023
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Civil Contempt ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AVIJIT SARKAR AND ANR LAKSHMI PRASAD BHATTACHARYA
Respondent(s)
SUKMAR HALDER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA
CONTEMPT
APPLICATION
APPLICATION
APPLICATION
APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2023 | CONTEMPT |
| 27-02-2025 | APPLICATION |
| 20-02-2025 | APPLICATION |
| 09-01-2025 | APPLICATION |
| 14-11-2024 | APPLICATION |
Orders
The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the contempt application filed by petitioners Avijit Sarkar and Anr. against Sukumar Halder for default, as none of the petitioners appeared before the court at the time of hearing and no adjournment was sought. The Contempt Rule was consequently discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the contempt application filed by petitioners Avijit Sarkar and Anr. against Sukumar Halder for default, as none of the petitioners appeared before the court at the time of hearing and no adjournment was sought. The Contempt Rule was consequently discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts