SANTU SARDAR INDRANIL HALDER vs CESC LTD AND ORS — WPA/6637/2026

Case under West Bengal Electricity Act ,2003 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Mar-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0128412026

Filing Number

WPA/6525/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPA/6637/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Connection/Disconnection ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Electricity Act ,2003 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTU SARDAR INDRANIL HALDER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CESC LTD AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

    Summary: The court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition seeking an electricity connection to his premises. CESC Ltd. refused the connection citing a prior court order and the fact that the premises are constructed on East Kolkata Wetlands without proper authorization from authorities. The court upheld this refusal, finding no legal right to the connection given the environmental embargo and serious concerns about supplying electricity to properties in the protected wetlands area, though it granted liberty to approach CESC Ltd. if new facts emerge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/6637/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition seeking an electricity connection to his premises. CESC Ltd. refused the connection citing a prior court order and the fact that the premises are constructed on East Kolkata Wetlands without proper authorization from authorities. The court upheld this refusal, finding no legal right to the connection given the environmental embargo and serious concerns about supplying electricity to properties in the protected wetlands area, though it granted liberty to approach CESC Ltd. if new facts emerge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case