SK. MAHIDUL ALI @ MAIDUL ALI @ MAHI AND ANOTHER ROHAN DWAIPAYAN BHOWMICK vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/1295/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2025

CNR: WBCHCA0126922025

Filing Number

CRR/1244/2025

Filing Date

18-Mar-2025

Registration No

CRR/1295/2025

Registration Date

19-Mar-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Proceedings ( 75 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528
Indian Penal Code Act ,1860 Section 447/323/354A/376D/379/506/34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SK. MAHIDUL ALI @ MAIDUL ALI @ MAHI AND ANOTHER ROHAN DWAIPAYAN BHOWMICK

  2. 2.SK. SAIDUL ALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

  2. 2.XXX

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Dinesh Kumar SharmaView PDF

    The West Bengal High Court granted the petitioner's request to withdraw CRR 1295 of 2025 with liberty to pursue appropriate legal remedies. The court disposed of the petition while explicitly clarifying that no observations made constitute an expression on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Sep-2025

    Motion 5

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  4. 04-Aug-2025

    Motion 6

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  5. 07-Jul-2025

    Motion 6

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  6. 09-Jun-2025

    Motion 6

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  7. 24-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/1295/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The West Bengal High Court granted the petitioner's request to withdraw CRR 1295 of 2025 with liberty to pursue appropriate legal remedies. The court disposed of the petition while explicitly clarifying that no observations made constitute an expression on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case