M/S SUKUMAR SOLVENT PRIVATE LTD RAHUL DHANUKA vs SAMPATH KUMAR, ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE AND ANOTHER — CPAN/357/2026

Case under Provision of Contempt of Courts Act ,1971 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on 08th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0126452026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

23rd March 2026

Filing Number

CPAN/368/2026

Filing Date

16-03-2026

Registration No

CPAN/357/2026

Registration Date

16-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS)

Coram

HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS)

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

Acts & Sections

Provision of Contempt of Courts Act ,1971 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

M/S SUKUMAR SOLVENT PRIVATE LTD RAHUL DHANUKA

Respondent(s)

SAMPATH KUMAR, ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE AND ANOTHER

ATUL SAXENA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS)

23-03-2026

CONTEMPT

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL,HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS)

Summary: The contempt petition filed by M/S Sukumar Solvent Private Ltd. against Sampath Kumar, Additional Director General of Foreign Trade, was dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to approach the Single Judge to close the respondent department's right to file an affidavit-in-opposition that was not filed within the stipulated time as per the Division Bench order dated February 24, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The contempt petition filed by M/S Sukumar Solvent Private Ltd. against Sampath Kumar, Additional Director General of Foreign Trade, was dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to approach the Single Judge to close the respondent department's right to file an affidavit-in-opposition that was not filed within the stipulated time as per the Division Bench order dated February 24, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Provision of Contempt of Courts Act ,1971 All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case