BIJAN SIKDAR DEBAPRIYA MITRA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/6230/2025
Case under West Bengal Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Reservation of Vacancies in Services and Posts) Act ,1976 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 21st March 2025.
CNR: WBCHCA0125682025
Next Hearing
20th March 2025
Filing Number
WPA/6107/2025
Filing Date
17-03-2025
Registration No
WPA/6230/2025
Registration Date
17-03-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
In service Other 207 ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
21st March 2025
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BIJAN SIKDAR DEBAPRIYA MITRA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA
NEW MOTION
CONTEMPT APPLICATION
CONTEMPT APPLICATION
CONTEMPT APPLICATION
CONTEMPT APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2025 | NEW MOTION |
| 06-05-2026 | CONTEMPT APPLICATION |
| 04-05-2026 | CONTEMPT APPLICATION |
| 22-04-2026 | CONTEMPT APPLICATION |
| 06-04-2026 | CONTEMPT APPLICATION |
Orders
Case Summary: WPA 6230/2025 - Contempt Application The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the contempt application against the University of Calcutta Registrar, finding that while there was delay in complying with the Court's March 21, 2025 order to consider the petitioner's representation within eight weeks, the Registrar ultimately complied by passing a reasoned order on August 27, 2025. Justice Jay Sengupta held that since the alleged contemnor achieved compliance with the Court's direction, albeit belatedly, no further contempt proceedings were warranted, leaving the petitioner to challenge the substantive rejection order through appropriate channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPA 6230/2025 - Contempt Application The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the contempt application against the University of Calcutta Registrar, finding that while there was delay in complying with the Court's March 21, 2025 order to consider the petitioner's representation within eight weeks, the Registrar ultimately complied by passing a reasoned order on August 27, 2025. Justice Jay Sengupta held that since the alleged contemnor achieved compliance with the Court's direction, albeit belatedly, no further contempt proceedings were warranted, leaving the petitioner to challenge the substantive rejection order through appropriate channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts