ARABINDA SAMANTA RAJDEEP SINHA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/6553/2026
Case under West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) ,1948 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0125052026
Filing Number
WPA/6323/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPA/6553/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
ACQUISITION & REQUISITION OF LAND ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARABINDA SAMANTA RAJDEEP SINHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay BhattacharyyaView PDF
Summary: The Calcutta High Court disposed of the petition by granting the petitioner, Arabinda Samanta, liberty to file a comprehensive representation before the appropriate authority regarding non-payment of land acquisition compensation for Dag No. 382 in Purba Medinipur, which was acquired in 1975-76 while his siblings received compensation. The court directed the authority to consider and dispose of the representation with a reasoned order within twelve weeks, affording all affected parties a hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/6553/2026
Summary: The Calcutta High Court disposed of the petition by granting the petitioner, Arabinda Samanta, liberty to file a comprehensive representation before the appropriate authority regarding non-payment of land acquisition compensation for Dag No. 382 in Purba Medinipur, which was acquired in 1975-76 while his siblings received compensation. The court directed the authority to consider and dispose of the representation with a reasoned order within twelve weeks, affording all affected parties a hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts