PANJI GRIHA NIRMAN PVT. LTD. AND ORS ABHISMITA GOSWAMI vs AYAN SADHUKHAN AND ORS — CO /953/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 01st April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0124602026
Next Hearing
19th March 2026
Filing Number
CO /958/2026
Filing Date
16-03-2026
Registration No
CO /953/2026
Registration Date
16-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
RULE SECTION
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PANJI GRIHA NIRMAN PVT. LTD. AND ORS ABHISMITA GOSWAMI
Respondent(s)
AYAN SADHUKHAN AND ORS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | NEW MOTION | |
| 31-03-2026 | NEW MOTION | |
| 30-03-2026 | NEW MOTION | |
| 25-03-2026 | NEW MOTION |
Orders
Summary The Calcutta High Court held that the trial court erred in passing a status quo order ex parte on February 21, 2026, without notifying the petitioners despite their valid caveat (No. 1897 of 2025) filed on December 24, 2025. Following the precedent in *Sukumar Roy v. Pratul Kumar Roy*, the court mandated that the trial court must immediately hear the petitioners' recall application and, if satisfied that grounds exist, rehear the injunction application with the defendants present within ten days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Calcutta High Court held that the trial court erred in passing a status quo order ex parte on February 21, 2026, without notifying the petitioners despite their valid caveat (No. 1897 of 2025) filed on December 24, 2025. Following the precedent in *Sukumar Roy v. Pratul Kumar Roy*, the court mandated that the trial court must immediately hear the petitioners' recall application and, if satisfied that grounds exist, rehear the injunction application with the defendants present within ten days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts