SAPNA SUREKA AND ORS DIPANJAN DEY vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WPA/6343/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0124472026
Filing Number
WPA/6293/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPA/6343/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Residuary ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAPNA SUREKA AND ORS DIPANJAN DEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Case History
-
05-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-May-2026
Urgent Motion 1
Hon'ble Justice Krishna Rao
-
05-May-2026
To Be Mentioned
Hon'ble Justice Krishna Rao
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Krishna RaoView PDF
Case Summary The High Court at Calcutta granted a status quo on further proceedings before the PMLA Adjudicating Authority in response to a Supreme Court order dated March 9, 2026, which had directed maintenance of status quo pending determination of constitutional challenges to the adjudicating authority's composition. The petitioners were directed to file an undertaking by March 25, 2026, not to alienate subject properties, with the matter listed for May 5, 2026, for respondents to file their affidavit-in-opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Urgent Motion 1
Hon'ble Justice Krishna Rao
-
19-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Krishna RaoView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/6343/2026
Case Summary The High Court at Calcutta granted a status quo on further proceedings before the PMLA Adjudicating Authority in response to a Supreme Court order dated March 9, 2026, which had directed maintenance of status quo pending determination of constitutional challenges to the adjudicating authority's composition. The petitioners were directed to file an undertaking by March 25, 2026, not to alienate subject properties, with the matter listed for May 5, 2026, for respondents to file their affidavit-in-opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts