NIYAZUL HAQUE ANSARI SATABDI DAS vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/6565/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0123932026
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
Filing Number
WPA/6261/2026
Filing Date
16-03-2026
Registration No
WPA/6565/2026
Registration Date
17-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NIYAZUL HAQUE ANSARI SATABDI DAS
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA
NEW MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
NEW MOTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 06-05-2026 | MOTION |
| 04-05-2026 | MOTION |
| 06-04-2026 | MOTION |
| 02-04-2026 | NEW MOTION |
Orders
Case Summary: WPA 6565/2026 The Calcutta High Court disposed of the petition by directing the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests to decide the petitioner's compassionate appointment application within eight weeks, strictly per prevailing rules. The petitioner's father, a Group-D forest employee, died in February 2022; despite a screening committee being constituted in July 2023, no decision had been made despite multiple representations. The court emphasized that compassionate appointments must be considered urgently and not kept indefinitely pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPA 6565/2026 The Calcutta High Court disposed of the petition by directing the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests to decide the petitioner's compassionate appointment application within eight weeks, strictly per prevailing rules. The petitioner's father, a Group-D forest employee, died in February 2022; despite a screening committee being constituted in July 2023, no decision had been made despite multiple representations. The court emphasized that compassionate appointments must be considered urgently and not kept indefinitely pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts