GOKUL CHAKRABORTY TAPASH KUMAR MONDAL vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/6385/2026

Case under Police Act ,1861 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 25-Mar-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0122942026

Filing Number

WPA/6202/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPA/6385/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

POLICE INACTION/ACTION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION

Last updated 15-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Police Act ,1861 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOKUL CHAKRABORTY TAPASH KUMAR MONDAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Saugata BhattacharyyaView PDF

    The West Bengal High Court dismissed the writ petition (WPA 6385 of 2026) filed by Gokul Chakraborty as not pressed because it was not filed following the relevant procedural rules applicable to POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) cases and the petitioner's identity was disclosed in the petition. However, the court preserved the petitioner's right to pursue legal remedies in accordance with law if circumstances warrant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/6385/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The West Bengal High Court dismissed the writ petition (WPA 6385 of 2026) filed by Gokul Chakraborty as not pressed because it was not filed following the relevant procedural rules applicable to POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) cases and the petitioner's identity was disclosed in the petition. However, the court preserved the petitioner's right to pursue legal remedies in accordance with law if circumstances warrant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case