SANTANU BHATTACHARJEE SUBRATA GHOSH vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(M)/685/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Mar-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0120142026

Filing Number

CRM(M)/653/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM(M)/685/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
Indian Penal Code Act ,1860 Section 420/409/418/467/468/471/477A/120B/34
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTANU BHATTACHARJEE SUBRATA GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar GhoshView PDF

    The court rejected Santanu Bhattacharjee's bail application in a fraud case involving Rs. 3.33 crores from a pension fund, despite his 1 year 5 months in custody without charge framing. However, the court directed the trial court to expedite proceedings by completing warrant processes within 60 days and proceeding to charge consideration by July 1, 2026, allowing the petitioner to renew his bail plea after charges are framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Bail Application

    Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar GhoshView PDF

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(M)/685/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Santanu Bhattacharjee's bail application in a fraud case involving Rs. 3.33 crores from a pension fund, despite his 1 year 5 months in custody without charge framing. However, the court directed the trial court to expedite proceedings by completing warrant processes within 60 days and proceeding to charge consideration by July 1, 2026, allowing the petitioner to renew his bail plea after charges are framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case