SANJIT BIJLI PRIYANKA BHOWMIK vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/6081/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement Security Interest Act ,2002 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 25th March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0119902026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

23rd March 2026

Filing Number

WPA/6066/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

WPA/6081/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement Security Interest Act ,2002 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

SANJIT BIJLI PRIYANKA BHOWMIK

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

OC KASHIPUR PS (Police Station)

IIFL HOME FINANCE LTD.

AUTHORISED OFFICER, AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LTD

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR

23-03-2026

NEW MOTION

25-03-2026

NEW MOTION 1

Orders

23-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR
25-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR

The High Court dismissed the petitioner's Writ Petition challenging SARFAESI Act enforcement action, holding that Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 creates a statutory bar on writ court interference in such matters. The court directed the petitioner to pursue available statutory remedies while clarifying that no merits adjudication was made and all issues remain open for the appropriate tribunal's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court dismissed the petitioner's Writ Petition challenging SARFAESI Act enforcement action, holding that Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 creates a statutory bar on writ court interference in such matters. The court directed the petitioner to pursue available statutory remedies while clarifying that no merits adjudication was made and all issues remain open for the appropriate tribunal's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

securitisation-and-reconstruction-of-financial-assets-and-enforcement-security-interest-act-2002 All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case