SARWAR JAHAN RAJA DAS vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/6156/2026

Case under West Bengal Higher Secondary Education Act ,1963 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Mar-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0118462026

Filing Number

WPA/5979/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPA/6156/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Selection Process 130 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Higher Secondary Education Act ,1963 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARWAR JAHAN RAJA DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar MitraView PDF

    The West Bengal High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation by April 30, 2026, challenging the appointments of respondents 7 and 8 as President and Member of the Managing Committee, which allegedly violated applicable notification requirements. The court ordered respondent no. 3 to consider and decide the matter by May 31, 2026, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    New Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    New Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    New Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/6156/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The West Bengal High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation by April 30, 2026, challenging the appointments of respondents 7 and 8 as President and Member of the Managing Committee, which allegedly violated applicable notification requirements. The court ordered respondent no. 3 to consider and decide the matter by May 31, 2026, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case