GOUTAM SAHOO PRIYANKA SAHA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — FMA/690/2022

Case under School Service Commission Act ,1997 Section NA. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-Apr-2022

CNR: WBCHCA0116712022

Filing Number

MAT/452/2022

Filing Date

29-Mar-2022

Registration No

FMA/690/2022

Registration Date

29-Mar-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

In service Other 117 ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

School Service Commission Act ,1997 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOUTAM SAHOO PRIYANKA SAHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty,hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi ChatterjeeView PDF

    FMA 690/2022 - Goutam Sahoo v. State of West Bengal & Others The West Bengal High Court dismissed the appeal filed by Goutam Sahoo for default on June 12, 2026, as neither the appellant nor their counsel appeared before the court and no request for adjournment was made. The court proceeded with the dismissal based on the appellant's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Education (Gr - II)

    Hon'ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee

  4. 04-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 29-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. FMA/690/2022

casestatus.in Summary

FMA 690/2022 - Goutam Sahoo v. State of West Bengal & Others The West Bengal High Court dismissed the appeal filed by Goutam Sahoo for default on June 12, 2026, as neither the appellant nor their counsel appeared before the court and no request for adjournment was made. The court proceeded with the dismissal based on the appellant's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case