MAJFIRA BIBI MAITRAYEE CHATTERJEE vs NITIN SINGHANIA, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MURSHIDABAD AND ANR — CPAN/321/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section NA. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Next hearing 02-Jul-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0114732026

Filing Number

CPAN/330/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

CPAN/321/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Civil Contempt ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAJFIRA BIBI MAITRAYEE CHATTERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NITIN SINGHANIA, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MURSHIDABAD AND ANR

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF

    Case Summary: CPAN 321/2026 In this contempt petition, Majfira Bibi alleged violation of a court direction dated 6th August 2025 by respondent Nitin Singhania (District Magistrate, Murshidabad) and others. The High Court at Calcutta directed the petitioner to serve copies of the contempt application on the alleged contemnors with the matter scheduled for 2nd July 2026, while clarifying that the contempt application's pendency would not prevent compliance with the original court order. The court also permitted impleading a new incumbent as respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-May-2026

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPAN/321/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CPAN 321/2026 In this contempt petition, Majfira Bibi alleged violation of a court direction dated 6th August 2025 by respondent Nitin Singhania (District Magistrate, Murshidabad) and others. The High Court at Calcutta directed the petitioner to serve copies of the contempt application on the alleged contemnors with the matter scheduled for 2nd July 2026, while clarifying that the contempt application's pendency would not prevent compliance with the original court order. The court also permitted impleading a new incumbent as respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case