M/S INTEGRATED SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD AND ORS PARTHA GHOSH vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WPA/5478/2026
Case under Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0111282026
Filing Number
WPA/5608/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPA/5478/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Residuary ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S INTEGRATED SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD AND ORS PARTHA GHOSH
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
For Dismissal
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF
Summary The court dismissed the writ petition filed by M/s. Integrated Solar Technologies Pvt. Ltd. challenging an e-auction sale notice issued under SARFAESI Act, 2002, finding no grounds for judicial intervention. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the statutory alternative remedy under Section 17 of SARFAESI, with all substantive issues left open for the appropriate authority to decide on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
New Motion 1
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/5478/2026
Summary The court dismissed the writ petition filed by M/s. Integrated Solar Technologies Pvt. Ltd. challenging an e-auction sale notice issued under SARFAESI Act, 2002, finding no grounds for judicial intervention. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the statutory alternative remedy under Section 17 of SARFAESI, with all substantive issues left open for the appropriate authority to decide on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts