SK. ABDUL RAHAMAN MR M.RAHAMAN vs W.B.S.E.B. — WPA/10551/1996

Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: WBCHCA0110141996

Filing Number

WPA/11014/1996

Filing Date

25-Jul-1996

Registration No

WPA/10551/1996

Registration Date

25-Jul-1996

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

BILLING ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 29-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SK. ABDUL RAHAMAN MR M.RAHAMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.W.B.S.E.B.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

    The court dismissed WPA 10551 of 1996 for default on May 19, 2026, as neither party appeared for hearing despite sufficient notice and the matter being listed in the Warning List. The dismissal was also necessitated by the department's inability to locate case records in any system, including CIS and Movement Registers. All interim orders were vacated, and the department was directed to take necessary steps. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    Old Matter

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  4. 18-May-2026

    Old Matter

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  5. 15-May-2026

    Old Matter

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  6. 14-May-2026

    Old Matter

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  7. 13-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 25-Jul-1996

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/10551/1996

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed WPA 10551 of 1996 for default on May 19, 2026, as neither party appeared for hearing despite sufficient notice and the matter being listed in the Warning List. The dismissal was also necessitated by the department's inability to locate case records in any system, including CIS and Movement Registers. All interim orders were vacated, and the department was directed to take necessary steps. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case