SUNITA BERA AND ORS SIDDHARTHA SARKAR vs NATIONAL INS CO LTD AND ANR — FMA/511/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act ,1988 Section NA. Disposed: --DISPOSED on 25th September 2025.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Mar-2025

CNR: WBCHCA0110102025

Filing Number

FMAT (MV)/148/2025

Filing Date

06-Mar-2025

Registration No

FMA/511/2025

Registration Date

06-Mar-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Motor Accident Claim ( 36 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Decision Date

25-Sep-2025

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act ,1988 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNITA BERA AND ORS SIDDHARTHA SARKAR

  2. 2.SOURAV BERA, MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER SUNITA BERA

  3. 3.SOUBHIK BERA, MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER SUNITA BERA

  4. 4.BHABANI BERA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NATIONAL INS CO LTD AND ANR

  2. 2.SEKH ABDUL RAHIM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya BandyopadhyayView PDF

    The court corrected a typographical error in its order dated 17.02.2026 regarding FMA 511/2025 (Sunita Bera & Ors. v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.). The court clarified that the compensation amount in the 9th paragraph should read Rs. 1,52,56,819/- instead of the erroneously recorded Rs. 1,31,83,968/-, directing the department to make the necessary correction while keeping all other portions of the order intact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya BandyopadhyayView PDF

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya BandyopadhyayView PDF

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya BandyopadhyayView PDF

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya BandyopadhyayView PDF

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    To Be Mentioned

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  8. 25-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya BandyopadhyayView PDF

  9. 25-Sep-2025

    For Orders 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  10. 24-Sep-2025

    For Orders 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  11. 23-Sep-2025

    For Orders 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  12. 22-Sep-2025

    For Orders 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  13. 19-Sep-2025

    For Orders 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  14. 18-Sep-2025

    For Orders 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  15. 17-Sep-2025

    For Orders 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  16. 16-Sep-2025

    For Orders 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  17. 15-Sep-2025

    For Orders 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  18. 12-Sep-2025

    For Orders 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  19. 11-Sep-2025

    For Orders 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  20. 10-Sep-2025

    For Orders 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  21. 09-Sep-2025

    For Orders 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  22. 08-Sep-2025

    Claim Case

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  23. 25-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya BandyopadhyayView PDF

  24. 25-Jul-2025

    Claim Case

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  25. 24-Jul-2025

    Claim Case

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  26. 23-Jul-2025

    Claim Case

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  27. 22-Jul-2025

    Claim Case

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  28. 24-Apr-2025

    To Be Mentioned

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay

  29. 12-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya BandyopadhyayView PDF

  30. 12-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Ananya BandyopadhyayView PDF

  31. 12-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 06-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. FMA/511/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court corrected a typographical error in its order dated 17.02.2026 regarding FMA 511/2025 (Sunita Bera & Ors. v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.). The court clarified that the compensation amount in the 9th paragraph should read Rs. 1,52,56,819/- instead of the erroneously recorded Rs. 1,31,83,968/-, directing the department to make the necessary correction while keeping all other portions of the order intact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case