CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANR. ARIJIT GHOSH vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/5626/2026

Case under Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.

Next hearing 30-Mar-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0110092026

Filing Number

WPA/5525/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPA/5626/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANR. ARIJIT GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. 30-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    New Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

    Summary: The petition challenging the non-disposal of a SARFAESI application filed before the District Magistrate, North 24-Parganas on July 25, 2025, was adjourned to March 30, 2026. The court criticized the State's inordinate and unexplained delay in disposing the application despite the statutory 60-day mandate and directed the District Magistrate to dispose it expeditiously while also requiring the State to provide reasons and names of officers responsible for the deliberate delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/5626/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition challenging the non-disposal of a SARFAESI application filed before the District Magistrate, North 24-Parganas on July 25, 2025, was adjourned to March 30, 2026. The court criticized the State's inordinate and unexplained delay in disposing the application despite the statutory 60-day mandate and directed the District Magistrate to dispose it expeditiously while also requiring the State to provide reasons and names of officers responsible for the deliberate delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case