SHIBANI SAHA DEY @ SHIBANI SAHA PRITI KAR BAGCHI vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/1082/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528/442. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0109652026
Next Hearing
09th March 2026
Filing Number
CRR/1071/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
CRR/1082/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Prohibitory Orders ( 74 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHIBANI SAHA DEY @ SHIBANI SAHA PRITI KAR BAGCHI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
XXXXXXX
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA
NEW MOTION
TO BE MENTIONED
TO BE MENTIONED
CONTESTED APPLICATION
CONTESTED APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 05-05-2026 | TO BE MENTIONED |
| 04-05-2026 | TO BE MENTIONED |
| 22-04-2026 | CONTESTED APPLICATION |
| 21-04-2026 | CONTESTED APPLICATION |
Orders
Summary of CRR 1082/2026 The court set aside the Special Judge's January 5, 2026 order issuing warrants of proclamation and attachment against petitioner Shibani Saha Dey, holding that since the petitioner had complied with a notice under Section 35(3) BNSS 2023 and appeared before the investigating officer, there was no justification for marking her as absconding in the chargesheet or issuing an arrest warrant. The court further held that simultaneous proclamation and attachment orders could not be issued without satisfying statutory requirements under Section 85(1) BNSS 2023, and attachment should ordinarily follow completed proclamation procedures. The matter was remitted for fresh proceedings in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CRR 1082/2026 The court set aside the Special Judge's January 5, 2026 order issuing warrants of proclamation and attachment against petitioner Shibani Saha Dey, holding that since the petitioner had complied with a notice under Section 35(3) BNSS 2023 and appeared before the investigating officer, there was no justification for marking her as absconding in the chargesheet or issuing an arrest warrant. The court further held that simultaneous proclamation and attachment orders could not be issued without satisfying statutory requirements under Section 85(1) BNSS 2023, and attachment should ordinarily follow completed proclamation procedures. The matter was remitted for fresh proceedings in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts