RAM PRASAD MONDAL PARTHA SENGUPTA vs KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. — WPA/5701/2024

Case under Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act ,1980 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 01st March 2024.

Case disposed Next hearing 01-Mar-2024

CNR: WBCHCA0109532024

Filing Number

WPA/5849/2024

Filing Date

28-Feb-2024

Registration No

WPA/5701/2024

Registration Date

28-Feb-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

DEMOLITION ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

01-Mar-2024

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act ,1980 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM PRASAD MONDAL PARTHA SENGUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF

    The High Court dismissed the application (CAN 1 of 2026) filed by a private respondent seeking modification of the original March 1, 2024 order in WPA 5701/2024. The court found the application misconceived because premises 18B was never the subject matter of the original writ petition concerning premises 18B/1, and any grievance regarding 18B constitutes a separate cause of action requiring a fresh petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 01-Mar-2024

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF

  5. 01-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 01-Mar-2024

    Urgent Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  7. 28-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/5701/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court dismissed the application (CAN 1 of 2026) filed by a private respondent seeking modification of the original March 1, 2024 order in WPA 5701/2024. The court found the application misconceived because premises 18B was never the subject matter of the original writ petition concerning premises 18B/1, and any grievance regarding 18B constitutes a separate cause of action requiring a fresh petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case