VIJAY PRAKASH KINNOR GHOSH vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WPA/5721/2026

Case under Railway Protection Force Act ,1957 Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: WBCHCA0108992026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

WPA/5469/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

WPA/5721/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Acts & Sections

Railway Protection Force Act ,1957 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

VIJAY PRAKASH KINNOR GHOSH

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

16-03-2026

NEW MOTION

18-05-2026

MOTION

04-05-2026

MOTION

30-04-2026

MOTION

06-04-2026

MOTION

Orders

18-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

Case Summary: WPA 5721/2026 - Vijay Prakash v. Union of India Vijay Prakash challenged a charge sheet dated December 15, 2025, alleging it was issued with a closed mind and predetermined guilt. He sought an interim order to restrain disciplinary proceedings pending writ petition disposal. The Calcutta High Court rejected the closed-mind allegation, finding the charges were merely specified to allow proper response. The petition was adjourned: respondents must file affidavit-in-opposition within 8 weeks, with petitioner's reply due within 2 weeks thereafter. The disciplinary proceeding's final order shall abide by the writ petition's result. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 5721/2026 - Vijay Prakash v. Union of India Vijay Prakash challenged a charge sheet dated December 15, 2025, alleging it was issued with a closed mind and predetermined guilt. He sought an interim order to restrain disciplinary proceedings pending writ petition disposal. The Calcutta High Court rejected the closed-mind allegation, finding the charges were merely specified to allow proper response. The petition was adjourned: respondents must file affidavit-in-opposition within 8 weeks, with petitioner's reply due within 2 weeks thereafter. The disciplinary proceeding's final order shall abide by the writ petition's result. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case