SK. MANJURUL ISLAM KALPITA PAUL vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/5699/2026
Case under West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA. Next hearing: 26th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0108952026
Filing Number
WPA/5467/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPA/5699/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SK. MANJURUL ISLAM KALPITA PAUL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
26-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
26-Jun-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
20-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF
WPA 5699/2026 Summary: In this Writ Petition filed by Sk. Manjural Islam against the State of West Bengal and others, the court (Justice Suvra Ghosh) adjourned the matter for further hearing on June 26, 2026. The State was not represented during the hearing. Counsels for the petitioner and respondent no.6 were present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF
-
06-May-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF
-
20-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
17-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
13-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
10-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
06-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/5699/2026
WPA 5699/2026 Summary: In this Writ Petition filed by Sk. Manjural Islam against the State of West Bengal and others, the court (Justice Suvra Ghosh) adjourned the matter for further hearing on June 26, 2026. The State was not represented during the hearing. Counsels for the petitioner and respondent no.6 were present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts