SHUBHENDU SARKAR HAMIDUR RAHAMAN vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA /5622/2026

Case under Police Act ,1861 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0108582026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

17th March 2026

Filing Number

WPA /5447/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

WPA /5622/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

POLICE INACTION/ACTION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Police Act ,1861 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

SHUBHENDU SARKAR HAMIDUR RAHAMAN

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

17-03-2026

NEW MOTION

Orders

23-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

The West Bengal High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Shubhendu Sarkar seeking police protection to possess disputed land. The court held that since both the petitioner and private respondents have filed competing civil suits (Suit 457/2025 and T.S. 329/2025) claiming rights over the same land, the police authority is not authorized to decide the inter se rights of parties—this is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the civil court. The petitioner remains free to pursue remedies through appropriate legal forums. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The West Bengal High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Shubhendu Sarkar seeking police protection to possess disputed land. The court held that since both the petitioner and private respondents have filed competing civil suits (Suit 457/2025 and T.S. 329/2025) claiming rights over the same land, the police authority is not authorized to decide the inter se rights of parties—this is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the civil court. The petitioner remains free to pursue remedies through appropriate legal forums. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case