M/S RAMESWARA LEASING PVT. LTD. SOURYADEEP GHOSH vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/5394/2026

Case under Police Act ,1861 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Mar-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0108522026

Filing Number

WPA/5444/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPA/5394/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Police Act ,1861 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S RAMESWARA LEASING PVT. LTD. SOURYADEEP GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Saugata BhattacharyyaView PDF

    The High Court of West Bengal dismissed the writ petition filed by M/s Rameswara Leasing Pvt. Ltd., refusing to intervene in a land dispute where the petitioner sought to restrain unauthorized use of disputed land as a burial ground by non-parties. The court declined to interfere because the underlying title suit (T.S. 692 of 2025) and a separate application alleging violation of the ad interim injunction order are pending before the Civil Court, and premature intervention would prejudge the substantive merits that remain to be decided in the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Saugata BhattacharyyaView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/5394/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of West Bengal dismissed the writ petition filed by M/s Rameswara Leasing Pvt. Ltd., refusing to intervene in a land dispute where the petitioner sought to restrain unauthorized use of disputed land as a burial ground by non-parties. The court declined to interfere because the underlying title suit (T.S. 692 of 2025) and a separate application alleging violation of the ad interim injunction order are pending before the Civil Court, and premature intervention would prejudge the substantive merits that remain to be decided in the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case