M/S RAMESWARA LEASING PVT. LTD. SOURYADEEP GHOSH vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA /5394/2026
Case under Police Act ,1861 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0108522026
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Number
WPA /5444/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
WPA /5394/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S RAMESWARA LEASING PVT. LTD. SOURYADEEP GHOSH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | NEW MOTION | |
| 23-03-2026 | NEW MOTION |
Orders
The High Court of West Bengal dismissed the writ petition filed by M/s Rameswara Leasing Pvt. Ltd., refusing to intervene in a land dispute where the petitioner sought to restrain unauthorized use of disputed land as a burial ground by non-parties. The court declined to interfere because the underlying title suit (T.S. 692 of 2025) and a separate application alleging violation of the ad interim injunction order are pending before the Civil Court, and premature intervention would prejudge the substantive merits that remain to be decided in the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of West Bengal dismissed the writ petition filed by M/s Rameswara Leasing Pvt. Ltd., refusing to intervene in a land dispute where the petitioner sought to restrain unauthorized use of disputed land as a burial ground by non-parties. The court declined to interfere because the underlying title suit (T.S. 692 of 2025) and a separate application alleging violation of the ad interim injunction order are pending before the Civil Court, and premature intervention would prejudge the substantive merits that remain to be decided in the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts