DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY ADRA DEBJANI GHOSAL vs M/S V - BRO ENGINEERING SERVICE — AO-COM/10/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Mar-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0103792026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

AO-COM/9/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

AO-COM/10/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Arbitration ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY ADRA DEBJANI GHOSAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S V - BRO ENGINEERING SERVICE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak,hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar RashidiView PDF

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak,hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar RashidiView PDF

  4. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak,hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar RashidiView PDF

    Case Summary: AO-COM/10/2026 The High Court of Calcutta dismissed the Railway's appeal challenging the trial court's rejection of its delay condonation application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Though the appellate court initially condoned the delay in filing the appeal itself, it found no merit in the underlying challenge to the arbitral award, as the appellant failed to provide adequate explanation for the delay in challenging the June 1, 2024 arbitral award and presented inconsistent grounds before different courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 07-May-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

  6. 06-May-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

  7. 05-May-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

  8. 04-May-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

  9. 30-Apr-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

  10. 28-Apr-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

  11. 27-Apr-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

  12. 24-Apr-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

  13. 23-Apr-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

  14. 22-Apr-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

  15. 21-Apr-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

  16. 20-Apr-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

  17. 17-Apr-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

  18. 16-Apr-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

  19. 20-Mar-2026

    LD. Registrar Admn. (L and Om)View PDF

  20. 12-Mar-2026

    LD. Registrar Admn. (L and Om)View PDF

  21. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AO-COM/10/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: AO-COM/10/2026 The High Court of Calcutta dismissed the Railway's appeal challenging the trial court's rejection of its delay condonation application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Though the appellate court initially condoned the delay in filing the appeal itself, it found no merit in the underlying challenge to the arbitral award, as the appellant failed to provide adequate explanation for the delay in challenging the June 1, 2024 arbitral award and presented inconsistent grounds before different courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case