TAPAS BANERJEE PARTHA PRATIM SINHA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA(P) /100/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0102782026
Next Hearing
10th March 2026
Filing Number
WPA(P) /103/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
WPA(P) /100/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN
Coram
HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Public Interest Litigation ( 21 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TAPAS BANERJEE PARTHA PRATIM SINHA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NORTH 24 PARGANAS
THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER
THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
THE SABHADIPATI, ZILLA PARISHAD, NORTH 24 PARGANAS
THE PRADHAN, BHURKUNDAS GRAM PANCHAYAT
THE PRADHAN, BERABERI GRAM PANCHAYAT
THE PRADHAN, GUMA-I GRAM PANCHAYAT
THE PRADHAN, SRIKRISHNAPUR GRAM PANCHAYAT
THE PRADHAN, RAJIBPUR-BIRA GRAM PANCHAYAT
THE PRADHAN, DIGHRA MALICKBERIA GRAM PANCHAYAT
THE PRADHAN, BANSPUL GRAM PANCHAYAT
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN
NEW MOTION
PIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | NEW MOTION | |
| 23-03-2026 | PIL |
Orders
The West Bengal High Court dismissed WPA(P) 100 of 2026 filed by Sri Tapas Banerjee against the State of West Bengal as withdrawn with liberty. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the PIL to file a regular petition on the same cause of action, to which the State did not object, and the court granted the withdrawal accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The West Bengal High Court dismissed WPA(P) 100 of 2026 filed by Sri Tapas Banerjee against the State of West Bengal as withdrawn with liberty. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the PIL to file a regular petition on the same cause of action, to which the State did not object, and the court granted the withdrawal accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts