HARIPADA SARDAR MD. GIASUDDIN MULLA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/5264/2026
Case under Police Act ,1861 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 31st March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0101652026
Filing Number
WPA/5087/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
WPA/5264/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
POLICE INACTION/ACTION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 15-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARIPADA SARDAR MD. GIASUDDIN MULLA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
-
2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CUM INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
-
3.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BASIRHAT POLICE DISTRICT
-
4.THE SDPO, MINAKHAN BLOCK
-
5.THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, SANDESHKHALI PS (Police Station)
-
6.AMUDULLA MOLLA
-
7.MONIRUL GAZI
-
8.MANIK SIKARI
-
9.JANAB SIKARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Saugata BhattacharyyaView PDF
The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition, holding that police authorities cannot adjudicate property disputes between competing claimants. While the petitioner claimed Bargadar (tenant) rights to cultivate disputed land and respondents claimed ownership through purchase, the court directed parties to pursue their claims through appropriate civil forums rather than police intervention, instructing police only to maintain peace and order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Saugata BhattacharyyaView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya
-
19-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Saugata BhattacharyyaView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/5264/2026
The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition, holding that police authorities cannot adjudicate property disputes between competing claimants. While the petitioner claimed Bargadar (tenant) rights to cultivate disputed land and respondents claimed ownership through purchase, the court directed parties to pursue their claims through appropriate civil forums rather than police intervention, instructing police only to maintain peace and order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts