HARIPADA SARDAR MD. GIASUDDIN MULLA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA /5264/2026

Case under Police Act ,1861 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 31st March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0101652026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

19th March 2026

Filing Number

WPA /5087/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

WPA /5264/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

POLICE INACTION/ACTION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

31st March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Police Act ,1861 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

HARIPADA SARDAR MD. GIASUDDIN MULLA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CUM INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BASIRHAT POLICE DISTRICT

THE SDPO, MINAKHAN BLOCK

THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, SANDESHKHALI PS (Police Station)

AMUDULLA MOLLA

MONIRUL GAZI

MANIK SIKARI

JANAB SIKARI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

09-03-2026

NEW MOTION

31-03-2026

NEW MOTION

25-03-2026

NEW MOTION

Orders

31-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition, holding that police authorities cannot adjudicate property disputes between competing claimants. While the petitioner claimed Bargadar (tenant) rights to cultivate disputed land and respondents claimed ownership through purchase, the court directed parties to pursue their claims through appropriate civil forums rather than police intervention, instructing police only to maintain peace and order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition, holding that police authorities cannot adjudicate property disputes between competing claimants. While the petitioner claimed Bargadar (tenant) rights to cultivate disputed land and respondents claimed ownership through purchase, the court directed parties to pursue their claims through appropriate civil forums rather than police intervention, instructing police only to maintain peace and order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case