MRINMOY MUKHERJEE DR. SIDDHARTHA GOSWAMI vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/5306/2026

Case under Land Acquisition and Resettlement Act ,2013 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Mar-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0101322026

Filing Number

WPA/5069/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

WPA/5306/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

Last updated 15-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition and Resettlement Act ,2013 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MRINMOY MUKHERJEE DR. SIDDHARTHA GOSWAMI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay BhattacharyyaView PDF

    The West Bengal High Court dismissed WPA 5306 of 2026 filed by Mrinmoy Mukherjee against the State of West Bengal as withdrawn, upon the petitioner's written request through his advocate. The petitioner was granted liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    To Be Mentioned

    Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay BhattacharyyaView PDF

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay BhattacharyyaView PDF

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/5306/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The West Bengal High Court dismissed WPA 5306 of 2026 filed by Mrinmoy Mukherjee against the State of West Bengal as withdrawn, upon the petitioner's written request through his advocate. The petitioner was granted liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case