NARESH SATNAMI AND ORS. AYUSHI MISHRA vs CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND ORS. — WPA /5298/2026

Case under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions (amendment) Act ,1988 Section NA. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0100152026

Next Hearing

04th May 2026

Filing Number

WPA /5003/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

WPA /5298/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

PROVIDENT FUND ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Acts & Sections

Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions (Amendment) Act ,1988 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

NARESH SATNAMI AND ORS. AYUSHI MISHRA

Respondent(s)

CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND ORS.

Hearing History

12-03-2026

NEW MOTION

04-05-2026

NEW MOTION (GROUP - III)

Orders

23-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)

Case Adjourned with Directions for Filing Affidavits WPA 5298 of 2026: The writ petition filed by Shri Naresh Satnami seeking outstanding retiral and provident fund dues has been adjourned. The court directed the respondent/provident fund authority to file an affidavit report, with the respondent no. 4 to file affidavit-in-opposition by April 17, 2026, and reply by April 30, 2026. The matter is listed for hearing in May 2026, with the maintainability issue to be heard first. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned with Directions for Filing Affidavits WPA 5298 of 2026: The writ petition filed by Shri Naresh Satnami seeking outstanding retiral and provident fund dues has been adjourned. The court directed the respondent/provident fund authority to file an affidavit report, with the respondent no. 4 to file affidavit-in-opposition by April 17, 2026, and reply by April 30, 2026. The matter is listed for hearing in May 2026, with the maintainability issue to be heard first. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case