AINAL SEIKH MR. A.BANERJEE vs THE GOVT. OF WEST BENGAL — WPA/7752/1996
Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 19th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0099731996
Filing Number
WPA/9973/1996
Filing Date
11-Jun-1996
Registration No
WPA/7752/1996
Registration Date
11-Jun-1996
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Connection/Disconnection ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
19-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 29-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AINAL SEIKH MR. A.BANERJEE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE GOVT. OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF
WPA 7752/1996 - Ainal Seikh vs. Govt. of West Bengal (Decided May 19, 2026) The court dismissed the writ petition for default after neither party appeared despite being listed for hearing with adequate notice. The department's report indicated that case records were untraceable in all available systems, making further proceedings impossible. All interim orders were vacated and the department was directed to take corrective steps. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-May-2026
Old Matter
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
-
18-May-2026
Old Matter
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
-
15-May-2026
Old Matter
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
-
14-May-2026
Old Matter
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
-
13-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jun-1996
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/7752/1996
WPA 7752/1996 - Ainal Seikh vs. Govt. of West Bengal (Decided May 19, 2026) The court dismissed the writ petition for default after neither party appeared despite being listed for hearing with adequate notice. The department's report indicated that case records were untraceable in all available systems, making further proceedings impossible. All interim orders were vacated and the department was directed to take corrective steps. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts