SOUVIK MITRA ZIALUL HAQUE vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WPA /5147/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0097362026
Next Hearing
11th March 2026
Filing Number
WPA /4857/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
WPA /5147/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
SUSPENSION ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SOUVIK MITRA ZIALUL HAQUE
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
PRINCIPAL CHIEF SECURITY COMMISSIONER, RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, EASTERN RAILWAY
SENIOR DIVISIONAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER, R.P.F. EASTERN RAILWAY, ASANSOL
ASSISTANT SECURITY COMMISSIONER, RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, EASTERN RAILWAY, ASANSOL
ASSISTANT SECURITY COMMISSIONER, R.P.F. EASTERN RAILWAY, ANDAL UNDER ASANSOL DIVISION
SENIOR DIVISIONAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER, R.P.F. EASTERN RAILWAY, ASANSOL
D.I.G. CUM CSC/R.P.F./KOLKATA, EASTERN RAILWAY CUM APPELLATE AUTHORITY
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA
NEW MOTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | NEW MOTION |
Orders
The High Court at Calcutta disposed of the writ petition without entering into the merits, finding it premature since the petitioner's revision petition was already pending before the competent authority. The court directed the revisional authority to decide the revision petition strictly according to law within the statutory timeframe, leaving all points open for the competent authority to decide based on whether principles of natural justice were violated in the de novo disciplinary proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court at Calcutta disposed of the writ petition without entering into the merits, finding it premature since the petitioner's revision petition was already pending before the competent authority. The court directed the revisional authority to decide the revision petition strictly according to law within the statutory timeframe, leaving all points open for the competent authority to decide based on whether principles of natural justice were violated in the de novo disciplinary proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts