PODDAR POINT OWNERS AND OCCUPIERS ASSOCIATION AND ANR CHUNKY AGARWAL vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/4943/2026

Case under Electricity Act ,2005 Section NA. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Next hearing 27-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0097132026

Filing Number

WPA/4845/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

WPA/4943/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Connection/Disconnection ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act ,2005 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PODDAR POINT OWNERS AND OCCUPIERS ASSOCIATION AND ANR CHUNKY AGARWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Returnable Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

    Summary: In WPA No. 4943 of 2026, the court adjourned the case to 27th April 2026. The court impleaded M.A. Leasing and Construction Pvt. Ltd. as a party respondent and directed service of the writ petition upon them. The private respondent was directed to file an Affidavit-in-Opposition within two weeks, with replies due one week thereafter. The parties were also directed to explore mediation without prejudice to their rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/4943/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In WPA No. 4943 of 2026, the court adjourned the case to 27th April 2026. The court impleaded M.A. Leasing and Construction Pvt. Ltd. as a party respondent and directed service of the writ petition upon them. The private respondent was directed to file an Affidavit-in-Opposition within two weeks, with replies due one week thereafter. The parties were also directed to explore mediation without prejudice to their rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case