NOOR JAHAN BEGUM INDRANIL HALDER vs CESC LIMITED AND ANR — WPA/4916/2026
Case under West Bengal Electricity Act ,2003 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0095762026
Filing Number
WPA/4758/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
WPA/4916/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Connection/Disconnection ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NOOR JAHAN BEGUM INDRANIL HALDER
Respondent(s)
-
1.CESC LIMITED AND ANR
-
2.THE DISTRICT ENGINEER, CESC LIMITED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF
The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the petition against CESC Limited's inaction in providing an electricity connection. The court found that the petitioner was already using an electricity connection in a third party's name and classified it as a "load splitting" case, which falls under the Grievance Redressal Officer's jurisdiction, directing the petitioner to approach the GRO for resolution within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
Returnable Motion
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
-
30-Mar-2026
Returnable Motion
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
-
12-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
-
05-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/4916/2026
The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the petition against CESC Limited's inaction in providing an electricity connection. The court found that the petitioner was already using an electricity connection in a third party's name and classified it as a "load splitting" case, which falls under the Grievance Redressal Officer's jurisdiction, directing the petitioner to approach the GRO for resolution within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts