DEEPAK KUMAR GUPTA LIPIKA CHATTERJEE vs AKASH KARATI AND ORS — CO/722/2026

Case under West Bengal Land Reforms Act ,1955 Section N A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0094112026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

09th March 2026

Filing Number

CO/728/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

CO/722/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

22nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Land Reforms Act ,1955 Section N A

Petitioner(s)

DEEPAK KUMAR GUPTA LIPIKA CHATTERJEE

Respondent(s)

AKASH KARATI AND ORS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

09-03-2026

NEW MOTION

22-05-2026

RETURNABLE MOTION

20-05-2026

UPGRADED MOTION

04-05-2026

RETURNABLE MOTION

30-04-2026

RETURNABLE MOTION

Orders

22-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

Case Summary: CO/722/2026 The Calcutta High Court dismissed Deepak Kumar Gupta's revisional petition challenging an appellate order granting a status quo injunction on suit properties. Gupta argued the appellate court lacked jurisdiction to pass the injunction order without hearing him despite his caveat, but the court found his argument baseless—Gupta had lodged the caveat only before the trial court, not the appellate court, rendering the jurisdictional challenge invalid. The petition was dismissed without costs, with the appellate court requested to expeditiously dispose the underlying appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CO/722/2026 The Calcutta High Court dismissed Deepak Kumar Gupta's revisional petition challenging an appellate order granting a status quo injunction on suit properties. Gupta argued the appellate court lacked jurisdiction to pass the injunction order without hearing him despite his caveat, but the court found his argument baseless—Gupta had lodged the caveat only before the trial court, not the appellate court, rendering the jurisdictional challenge invalid. The petition was dismissed without costs, with the appellate court requested to expeditiously dispose the underlying appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case