DEEPAK KUMAR GUPTA LIPIKA CHATTERJEE vs AKASH KARATI AND ORS — CO/722/2026
Case under West Bengal Land Reforms Act ,1955 Section N A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0094112026
Next Hearing
09th March 2026
Filing Number
CO/728/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
CO/722/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
RULE SECTION
Decision Date
22nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DEEPAK KUMAR GUPTA LIPIKA CHATTERJEE
Respondent(s)
AKASH KARATI AND ORS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
NEW MOTION
RETURNABLE MOTION
UPGRADED MOTION
RETURNABLE MOTION
RETURNABLE MOTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 22-05-2026 | RETURNABLE MOTION |
| 20-05-2026 | UPGRADED MOTION |
| 04-05-2026 | RETURNABLE MOTION |
| 30-04-2026 | RETURNABLE MOTION |
Orders
Case Summary: CO/722/2026 The Calcutta High Court dismissed Deepak Kumar Gupta's revisional petition challenging an appellate order granting a status quo injunction on suit properties. Gupta argued the appellate court lacked jurisdiction to pass the injunction order without hearing him despite his caveat, but the court found his argument baseless—Gupta had lodged the caveat only before the trial court, not the appellate court, rendering the jurisdictional challenge invalid. The petition was dismissed without costs, with the appellate court requested to expeditiously dispose the underlying appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CO/722/2026 The Calcutta High Court dismissed Deepak Kumar Gupta's revisional petition challenging an appellate order granting a status quo injunction on suit properties. Gupta argued the appellate court lacked jurisdiction to pass the injunction order without hearing him despite his caveat, but the court found his argument baseless—Gupta had lodged the caveat only before the trial court, not the appellate court, rendering the jurisdictional challenge invalid. The petition was dismissed without costs, with the appellate court requested to expeditiously dispose the underlying appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts