BUBAI CHHARI AND ORS SUDIPTA KUMAR DAS vs AMRITA HALDER DAS AND ORS — CO/723/2026
Case under Partition Act ,1893 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0093932026
Filing Number
CO/726/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
CO/723/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
RULE SECTION
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BUBAI CHHARI AND ORS SUDIPTA KUMAR DAS
-
2.TUKAI GHOSH
-
3.RUNAI MONDAL
-
4.SHARMISTA SEAL
-
5.NUPUR JANA
-
6.RUPA HALDER
-
7.TANUSREE HALDER
Respondent(s)
-
1.AMRITA HALDER DAS AND ORS
-
2.SHUBHAMOY HALDER, MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER NAMELY AMRITA HALDER DAS
-
3.JHUMUR SARDAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF
Summary of CO 723/2026 The High Court at Calcutta disposed of a revisional application by Bubai Chhari and others seeking expeditious disposal of two pending applications (Order 7 Rule 11 and Order 12 Rule 6) in Title Suit No. 1011/2022. The court directed the Civil Judge (Senior Division), 7th Court at Alipore to dispose of these applications within two months without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Expeditious Disposal Matters
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CO/723/2026
Summary of CO 723/2026 The High Court at Calcutta disposed of a revisional application by Bubai Chhari and others seeking expeditious disposal of two pending applications (Order 7 Rule 11 and Order 12 Rule 6) in Title Suit No. 1011/2022. The court directed the Civil Judge (Senior Division), 7th Court at Alipore to dispose of these applications within two months without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts