MADHAB PRADHAN ANKANA SARKAR vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA /4681/2026

Case under Indian Police Act ,1861 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0091122026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

05th March 2026

Filing Number

WPA /4557/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

WPA /4681/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

POLICE INACTION/ACTION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Indian Police Act ,1861 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

MADHAB PRADHAN ANKANA SARKAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

05-03-2026

NEW MOTION

23-03-2026

NEW MOTION

12-03-2026

NEW MOTION

Orders

23-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

Summary: The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Madhab Pradhan seeking police intervention to permit construction on disputed land. The court held that since a title suit (T.S. Case No. 115 of 2022) is already pending before the Civil Court regarding inter se rights between the petitioner and private respondents (brothers claiming ownership), police authority is not the appropriate forum to resolve property disputes. The petitioner was directed to pursue his remedy through the pending civil litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Madhab Pradhan seeking police intervention to permit construction on disputed land. The court held that since a title suit (T.S. Case No. 115 of 2022) is already pending before the Civil Court regarding inter se rights between the petitioner and private respondents (brothers claiming ownership), police authority is not the appropriate forum to resolve property disputes. The petitioner was directed to pursue his remedy through the pending civil litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case